Saturday 29 July 2023

Igniting Innovation = -5,3,1 to +1,3,5 Timing

Innovation, more misused than almost any other word means misunderstandings multiply without the reality check of " timing " being present.  But how can we cultivate it, timing, a mechanism even more misconstrued than possibly the word innovation itself ? But it doesn't need to be. Here's how.

With the ever present idea by Mark McCormack that "you can't teach timing" means the reality is that with a keen understanding of raw scientific research X taking sometimes 10 or more initial years, and ultimately 20 when it comes to truly experimental underlying physical sciences research, then leads to to an almost 10yr in lab invention window Y  before the primary movement to a usable Z based v0.5 of said original ground breaking X research takes place. Thus is the capability to teach innovation ( timing ) possible yes.

In the classic example of  Douglas Englebart's 1st lectures of a mouse ( based on years of previous efforts ) on what computers could be ( and would be ) and including his ground breaking work with augmented and virtual reality capabilities ( 1961 ) from work completed in US Military labs many more years earlier ( 1954 ) ; culminating with Englebart's " Mother of All Demos " ( 1968 ) then changed the face of computing. This led directly to the the creation of the the Xerox Alto at the famous Xerox PARC Labs ( 1972 ) resulting in the team pilfered from PARC to Apple who created of the 1st Macintosh Prototype ( 1981 ) and then onto launch of the the 1st Macintosh computer ( 1984 ) = a roughly 30yr ( 1054 - 1984 ) 3 phase path. And, where " industrial " use was in a -5,3,1 ( in commercial labs ) to real world +1,3,5 to launch system.

With the infrastructure in place via a government, military, commercial or artistic R&D model, the realty of The “ARPA Model” and as detailed in Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges the pattern not only becomes clear, but the timing even more carefully articulated and the marathon model uncovered that allows this to happen. Through consistent and carefully orchestrated internal competition and leadership rotations a relay system emerges which allows for breakthrough efforts to run the hurdles necessary for what could previously never have been done before to gestate and birth, within the explicit context of experimentation to usability, legitimate innovations. Surprisingly then timing, no matter how complex the jazz timing or how syncopated the movement of the players becomes, there is a way to achieve more than expected from the outset and exactly how cutting edge firms are able to leverage this today.

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

 

Wednesday 28 June 2023

R&D Realizations Mean Constant Convergence

With the consistent swarm of related and sometimes unrelated efforts necessary to push the boundaries of R&D into viable and usable tools, it's not only firm size, previous R&D experience, belonging to related high-tech services sectors and obtaining public funding which all influence positively and significantly the propensity to cooperate with agents of change to engage and support the capability of making breakthroughs take place. 


What this is often at odds with ( and due to the complexity of garnishing funding from country specific national science foundations, government and military funding sources  ) is what R&D portfolios of cooperating firms look like as compared to those that do not cooperate. In " Generation Activities And Innovation Results Of Firms " we see, interestingly it's firms that collaborated with customers and possible end users not yet prepared for massive technological changes which show significantly lower investment in basic research compared vs. firms where investments in applied research and basic research that end up seeing significantly greater success rates due to R&D convergence efforts. Where some firms are also able to effectively use this strategy to pursue objective short-term solutions to market needs, this has been shown to also be to the detriment of expanding their technological knowledge base to other fields ( via basic research ) and without this further expansion synergistic effects of said convergence capability and activities were smaller in firms that did not adopt this mechanism.

With basic research investment reductions and in the case of customer cooperating firms the pattern further reveals the preference of these companies to develop near-market research activities and thus an imbalance for farther reaching efforts in unproven targets but where said successes can be drastically effected by efforts such as consistent merger and acquisition activities. As in the case of apple and their new iVisionPro system such efforts to develop new product lines required an M&A activity of bringing in new companies on average of buying one company every two to three weeks and where many of these firms are effectively purchased out of existence due to the need for person talent and thus intellectual property capture and dominance. It is therefore that such a system and effectively " innovation plus " intellectual property via an R&D mentality that becomes the driving factor for specialized design and engineering solutions and thus a breakthrough innovation model implementation.

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

 

Wednesday 31 May 2023

Generative Creativity Is Anything But Common Goings-on

Not even one year ago, as the world slept, unaware ( except for a small group, relativistically ) of behind the scenes specialists, a 50yr race was running one of it's final relay sections. R&D Lab efforts unknown to most was about to break through it's shell where previously, the idea that Innovation Doesn't Have A Creativity Problem ; It's Got A Commitment Problem assumed that creativity was once like R&D ( a capability of a specific number of people, with advanced equipment ) was the case, but that with focus, creativity could be accessed by many. That however was all about to change.

iGNITIATE - Generative Creativity Is Anything But Common Goings-on

Little did the world know, we would soon all have a capability in our hands in no short time that would radically up-end the idea of even the thought of ownership and now it seems  Generative AI Has an Intellectual Property Problem where creativity is instantaneous and editable. Gone are the notions of years of graduate school necessary to hone the capability of creativity, but more, the capability to manifest it via highly specific technological tools, etc,. now leading us to a new torture: the legal and ethical challenges posed by generative AI, stemming from content based on existing data scraped from the web for free. Now, with Generative AI the disruption of the design world ( an AI enabling faster and more diverse creation of images, text, and other forms of expression ) is right on top of us all.

Can AI platform uses photos from a licensing service without permission to generate new images, violating the service's rights and expose itself and its users to legal action? Could it even be proven via some yet unknown reverse engineering of Ai created images to show their relevance to existing works, if those works could even be found and proven related? With AI platform and systems generating images resembling a famous painting or a brand logo, while it may infringe on the rights of the artist or the company that owns them could it even be that an artist or creator would even have the capability, let alone raw cash to mount such a lawsuit? Chances are no. There are the ideas of the fair use doctrine, if it is even possible to say that a new work is a criticism, comment, education, or research, but worse that as we all know, once it is on the web, the chances of ever having it taken down, not to mention again, the cost means that Generative Ai is the ever morphing digital noose that has no chance of ever being stopped thanks to in fact search engines. The noose tightens.

Creators, designers, architects, engineers then are faced with transparency and accountability for generative AI platforms but again, could the costs to even mount a case where designers and developers must prove license and compensation for content creators used to train their models, and maintain provenance records of the AI-generated works that include information about the platform, settings, seed data, metadata, and prompt even be possible? Unlikely. Confidential data, trade secrets, personal information and even within the context of millimeter by millimeter  exact copies of works, functionalities and even family photos used on the packaging ( as in the incredibly famous X-IT vs. Kiddy case - an open and shut situation that took 20yrs to come to court with a $116M judgement knocked down to $17M in final payout ) means Ai and Generative art are not only untraceable but even less protectable. The raw power and capability of Ai Generative art and nano-second publishing means an unlimited zeitgeist fire hose of power can be wielded and for which no laws can even begin to contain said capability. The 10,000b gorilla Genii is out of the bottle and now there is nothing that can ever contain it again.


Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

Friday 28 April 2023

Invention <> Innovation <> Intrapreneurship

With the plethora of design & innovation paradoxes at hand today, the reality is NPD ( new product development ) efforts and the turnaround roadblocks that are persistent in many situations ( to get from 0 to 1 ) are vastly different from the standpoint of usability that typical " successes " define.

Many times and known well often as the:
     • Innovation ( it works on a lab bench ) ;
     • Innovation ( a transition against the tides of "no" it's not acceptable ) into usability; and onto
     • Intrapreneurship ( at enough large enough firms ) so that usability is increased.
model, this also can be in an entrepreneurship model however the balance remains the same.

Seen in The Twelve Paradoxes of Innovation! and The Inescapable Paradox of Managing Creativity and more interestingly The Real Leadership Lessons of Steve Jobs where surprisingly we see the same pattern: the people paradox is not an innovation intractability situation. What then separates the core sections of awareness ( that X is possible through unique invention ) accountability ( through the process of innovation insertion into an already existing or entirely new area of capability ) and then on to acceptance ( large exiting organizational usage via an intrapreneurial stamp of "ok" ) and then ( with large organizations ) incredible adoptable daily usage ?

The separation is in knowing what category of "Innovation" ( a severely overused description ) a situation or activity is part of, and not fooling ourselves where:
     • an effort of invention is taking place
vs.
     • the unknown valley of death where innovation often has to live and breathe
and squarely between
     • the non top and ever pursuing step of intrapreneurship / entrepreneurship, or frankly, selling.

Where we see Job's efforts to mitigate this with: Focus ; Simplify ; Take Responsibility End to End ; When Behind, Leapfrog ; Put Products Before Profits ; Don’t Be a Slave To Focus Groups ; Bend Reality ; Impute ; Push for Perfection ; Tolerate Only “A” Players ; Engage Face-to-Face ; Know Both the Big Picture and the Details ; Combine the Humanities with the Sciences ; Stay Hungry ; Stay Foolish, so many of these are standard cannon in the New Product Development toolbox. More we see how Paradoxes of Innovation bind the idea of immediate results with grander capabilities and certainly vision and thus managing creativity is firmly mixed into this.

Knowing, Noticing and Locking down the core essences of the three phases of Zero to One in the rapidly evolving functional and aesthetic hyperplane that is design, engineering and finance and as all connected to an innovation mindset requires a capability to hold desperate and often contradicting capabilities all at the same time while progressing forward towards an often fuzzy and moving goal, however, in the end, it is ultimately reached.

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

 

Thursday 30 March 2023

Innovation IP = Advanced Awareness - Roadblock Resistance

Invention, Innovation, Design Thinking, New Product Development which we are always thinking about when creating future use, are the cornerstone of breakthroughs, but protecting them effectively is rapidly diminishing due to the digital hurdles that now ensure that the fruits of such labor are immediately perishable and/or easily copied and/or outright stolen. Welcome to the world of Generative Design fueled by Ai. But what can innovators do?

iGNITIATE : Innovation IP = Advanced Awareness - Roadblock Resistance

Patents and from the most recent issue of the famed Nature Magazine examine the most effective ways to protect intellectual property (IP) rights, and especially important in the world of lab-based research and development only become valuable when the cost of litigation is baked into every R&D effort by a patent and trademark protection model that incentivizes individuals and companies to invest said efforts upfront. With research and development the idea is that the product is the power, but by granting R&D and Innovation efforts the capability and resources ( read, cash, to protect said efforts ) only then do exclusive rights to inventions, IP, etc., allow firms to recoup efforts and reap the benefits when, in today's design and advanced engineering world, a copy will exist the moment a product is made available for use or purchase, and sometimes even before if it is mentioned in any way in the outside world.

At the heart of many breakthrough innovations, and fueled by deign and design thinking, it is he problem-solving methodology itself that becomes the crucible to potential future human needs and experience driving ROI. Design thinking, a fully multidisciplinary approach, blends creativity, technical engineering capabilities, and user-centricity to create solutions that are not only functional but also aesthetically pleasing and emotionally resonant which although everyone in today's world is well aware of, this also begs the question of how IP is leveraged for the sustainability of said efforts. This approach is especially effective in industries such as fashion, lifestyle ( home, family, etc., ) plus in automotive, and technology, where design drives shaping consumer preferences and ultimately market demand.

With breakthroughs not limited to design departments, design thinking practitioners and aesthetics focused team, along with user experience specialists who created the never ending bridges from expected behavior to future forward efforts, it ends up that design thinking / product capability quickly becomes the driver for advanced engineering thus the key component of new product development - a combination of ( in it's most powerful form ) where advanced R&D efforts meet and exceed performance and safety standards push the boundaries of what is not even known yet to exist. It is here that the artist's mentality begins to play an even larger part in the over all success of such efforts.

Design and innovation efforts speculating about future use is easily created with gathering around a table and giving themselves the creative oxygen and open space to explore the questions of tomorrow, designers with a keen capability to see what is available and where the direction is that a firm is going, means bridges between the present and the future are created. Imagining with hands, building to think, and blending strategic hunches with wild cognitive leaps, lab based efforts based on play and free association with a core sustainability component allow practitioners to slip past the rational mind and invite all the senses and capabilities of firms to drive breakthroughs. This practice of intentional play helps liberate thinking and allows what is initially not possible, to, be possible when intellectual property and functional production economics balanced with legitimate market demand capabilities are taken into consideration.

But what happens when these lab based R&D breakthroughs are realized as functionally usable or when forward deign efforts are pushed out to a broader audience? Can they be protected from being copied or stolen? In today's world, not often without substantial further investment. With the advent of patenting and more importantly patent & trademark litigation, by granting the inventors/creators/firms of effort, exclusive rights to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention for a limited period of time it's often that without litigation, there is no protection even when inventors and creators ( disclose the efforts to the public, allowing others to learn how things were done ) only increases the chance of further development, thus further patents, and so on and so on.

With the full on overpowering efforts of Ai, and more importantly generative Ai, the capability to protect IP has taken a turn that no litigation could ever keep up with and those owning inventions, patents, trademarks, copyright, etc,. even employees in large firms, start-ups, commercial R&D institutes, and universities ( typically protected in many ways of the ownership of IP developed ) may end up in the future automatically assigning IP to their employer, who, listed as applicant or assignee in legal documents, today, cannot even act quickly enough in a mode where the minute something is created and sold, the next minute it is re-morphed into another format and sold, etc., etc., etc., thus the disputes, previously sources of legal and financial headaches now may not even be executed on, for, as soon as one is dealt with, 100's more issues could be in the pipeline.

Despite the potential challenges, intellectual property protection, generative artificial intelligence, and incredibly expensive IP litigation, even when ultimately successful, requires a blend of forward thinking capability focused on firm sustainability for firms and financially strong groups to push beyond the limits of the onslaught of the Ai Generative Design zeitgeist that we are all facing now and, as pertaining to what Steve Jobs once said, that "Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower." yet only in terms of ROI. The most significant discoveries come from the creativity that comes from playing and experimenting and the freedom to imagine and explore, and embrace the wisdom of that labs based R&D efforts deliver to liberate roadblocks for breakthroughs that may change the world when woven carefully with entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial laser focus.

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

---