Friday 28 April 2023

Invention <> Innovation <> Intrapreneurship

With the plethora of design & innovation paradoxes at hand today, the reality is NPD ( new product development ) efforts and the turnaround roadblocks that are persistent in many situations ( to get from 0 to 1 ) are vastly different from the standpoint of usability that typical " successes " define.

Many times and known well often as the:
     • Innovation ( it works on a lab bench ) ;
     • Innovation ( a transition against the tides of "no" it's not acceptable ) into usability; and onto
     • Intrapreneurship ( at enough large enough firms ) so that usability is increased.
model, this also can be in an entrepreneurship model however the balance remains the same.

Seen in The Twelve Paradoxes of Innovation! and The Inescapable Paradox of Managing Creativity and more interestingly The Real Leadership Lessons of Steve Jobs where surprisingly we see the same pattern: the people paradox is not an innovation intractability situation. What then separates the core sections of awareness ( that X is possible through unique invention ) accountability ( through the process of innovation insertion into an already existing or entirely new area of capability ) and then on to acceptance ( large exiting organizational usage via an intrapreneurial stamp of "ok" ) and then ( with large organizations ) incredible adoptable daily usage ?

The separation is in knowing what category of "Innovation" ( a severely overused description ) a situation or activity is part of, and not fooling ourselves where:
     • an effort of invention is taking place
vs.
     • the unknown valley of death where innovation often has to live and breathe
and squarely between
     • the non top and ever pursuing step of intrapreneurship / entrepreneurship, or frankly, selling.

Where we see Job's efforts to mitigate this with: Focus ; Simplify ; Take Responsibility End to End ; When Behind, Leapfrog ; Put Products Before Profits ; Don’t Be a Slave To Focus Groups ; Bend Reality ; Impute ; Push for Perfection ; Tolerate Only “A” Players ; Engage Face-to-Face ; Know Both the Big Picture and the Details ; Combine the Humanities with the Sciences ; Stay Hungry ; Stay Foolish, so many of these are standard cannon in the New Product Development toolbox. More we see how Paradoxes of Innovation bind the idea of immediate results with grander capabilities and certainly vision and thus managing creativity is firmly mixed into this.

Knowing, Noticing and Locking down the core essences of the three phases of Zero to One in the rapidly evolving functional and aesthetic hyperplane that is design, engineering and finance and as all connected to an innovation mindset requires a capability to hold desperate and often contradicting capabilities all at the same time while progressing forward towards an often fuzzy and moving goal, however, in the end, it is ultimately reached.

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

 

Thursday 30 March 2023

Innovation IP = Advanced Awareness - Roadblock Resistance

Invention, Innovation, Design Thinking, New Product Development which we are always thinking about when creating future use, are the cornerstone of breakthroughs, but protecting them effectively is rapidly diminishing due to the digital hurdles that now ensure that the fruits of such labor are immediately perishable and/or easily copied and/or outright stolen. Welcome to the world of Generative Design fueled by Ai. But what can innovators do?

iGNITIATE : Innovation IP = Advanced Awareness - Roadblock Resistance

Patents and from the most recent issue of the famed Nature Magazine examine the most effective ways to protect intellectual property (IP) rights, and especially important in the world of lab-based research and development only become valuable when the cost of litigation is baked into every R&D effort by a patent and trademark protection model that incentivizes individuals and companies to invest said efforts upfront. With research and development the idea is that the product is the power, but by granting R&D and Innovation efforts the capability and resources ( read, cash, to protect said efforts ) only then do exclusive rights to inventions, IP, etc., allow firms to recoup efforts and reap the benefits when, in today's design and advanced engineering world, a copy will exist the moment a product is made available for use or purchase, and sometimes even before if it is mentioned in any way in the outside world.

At the heart of many breakthrough innovations, and fueled by deign and design thinking, it is he problem-solving methodology itself that becomes the crucible to potential future human needs and experience driving ROI. Design thinking, a fully multidisciplinary approach, blends creativity, technical engineering capabilities, and user-centricity to create solutions that are not only functional but also aesthetically pleasing and emotionally resonant which although everyone in today's world is well aware of, this also begs the question of how IP is leveraged for the sustainability of said efforts. This approach is especially effective in industries such as fashion, lifestyle ( home, family, etc., ) plus in automotive, and technology, where design drives shaping consumer preferences and ultimately market demand.

With breakthroughs not limited to design departments, design thinking practitioners and aesthetics focused team, along with user experience specialists who created the never ending bridges from expected behavior to future forward efforts, it ends up that design thinking / product capability quickly becomes the driver for advanced engineering thus the key component of new product development - a combination of ( in it's most powerful form ) where advanced R&D efforts meet and exceed performance and safety standards push the boundaries of what is not even known yet to exist. It is here that the artist's mentality begins to play an even larger part in the over all success of such efforts.

Design and innovation efforts speculating about future use is easily created with gathering around a table and giving themselves the creative oxygen and open space to explore the questions of tomorrow, designers with a keen capability to see what is available and where the direction is that a firm is going, means bridges between the present and the future are created. Imagining with hands, building to think, and blending strategic hunches with wild cognitive leaps, lab based efforts based on play and free association with a core sustainability component allow practitioners to slip past the rational mind and invite all the senses and capabilities of firms to drive breakthroughs. This practice of intentional play helps liberate thinking and allows what is initially not possible, to, be possible when intellectual property and functional production economics balanced with legitimate market demand capabilities are taken into consideration.

But what happens when these lab based R&D breakthroughs are realized as functionally usable or when forward deign efforts are pushed out to a broader audience? Can they be protected from being copied or stolen? In today's world, not often without substantial further investment. With the advent of patenting and more importantly patent & trademark litigation, by granting the inventors/creators/firms of effort, exclusive rights to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention for a limited period of time it's often that without litigation, there is no protection even when inventors and creators ( disclose the efforts to the public, allowing others to learn how things were done ) only increases the chance of further development, thus further patents, and so on and so on.

With the full on overpowering efforts of Ai, and more importantly generative Ai, the capability to protect IP has taken a turn that no litigation could ever keep up with and those owning inventions, patents, trademarks, copyright, etc,. even employees in large firms, start-ups, commercial R&D institutes, and universities ( typically protected in many ways of the ownership of IP developed ) may end up in the future automatically assigning IP to their employer, who, listed as applicant or assignee in legal documents, today, cannot even act quickly enough in a mode where the minute something is created and sold, the next minute it is re-morphed into another format and sold, etc., etc., etc., thus the disputes, previously sources of legal and financial headaches now may not even be executed on, for, as soon as one is dealt with, 100's more issues could be in the pipeline.

Despite the potential challenges, intellectual property protection, generative artificial intelligence, and incredibly expensive IP litigation, even when ultimately successful, requires a blend of forward thinking capability focused on firm sustainability for firms and financially strong groups to push beyond the limits of the onslaught of the Ai Generative Design zeitgeist that we are all facing now and, as pertaining to what Steve Jobs once said, that "Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower." yet only in terms of ROI. The most significant discoveries come from the creativity that comes from playing and experimenting and the freedom to imagine and explore, and embrace the wisdom of that labs based R&D efforts deliver to liberate roadblocks for breakthroughs that may change the world when woven carefully with entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial laser focus.

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

Thursday 23 February 2023

The Third Self: Design Innovations’ Next Muse

In 2001, our idea of The 3rd Self a precursor to the next almost 20yrs of efforts in artificial intelligence systems began. The idea, connected to the first BBS, called a Computerized Bulletin Board System (CBBS) in 1978 was where real people created useful avatars of themselves via something as simple as a username and where, possibly, our Second Self was born. It was that 2nd Self ( all the data we started generating for our user name(s) and that was connected daily and directly to us ) which was a drop in the ocean of the wave that was to come next.


 

Fast forward to 2023 and now, with widely accessible Ai ( the image for this article came from just asking for an image of ” the third self ” from a Generative Ai image creation system ) not to mention the almost ” sentient ” conversational Ai systems that are at the ready on just about any device imaginable. More we are interacting with said systems through beta version of @Amazon’s Alexa like voice interfaces which are being brought online everyday. Systems like @Microsoft’s Bing and @Google’s Bard not to mention @Facebook Meta’s BlenderBot are only the begging of western nation capabilities and full system functionalities  that chat openly with humans and about any topic imaginable ( in what seems like the Turing Test being beaten ) but which can also, in some cases, fully augment the design and engineering capabilities that we all struggle with every day – the infinitely complex time consuming tasks that we spend our days on. With such systems means the world has radically changed. Almost overnight. Almost.

We have jumped ( with the advent of readily accessible and tremendously powerful Ai systems available and at NO costs to users at this point ) from a clunky 8088 PC experience to a Macintosh world, a ” smart ” cell phone to the iPhone 1, seemingly, in the blink of an eye. A 70yr blink to be safe to say. With additional and almost incomprehensible capabilities of such Ai systems that can ” write a @WhatsApp message to my sister about options for vegetarian dishes made with pumpkin ” to ” create me an dynamic trading day trading algorithm based on the following criteria…. ” to ” imagine a series of high gloss black chairs based on the shape of a @Steinway&Sons Grand Piano ” coming online every second, it seems we are most likely days away from each and every person having their own, self aware ( and created from our own individual data: eg. your tweet from yesterday, a Facebook post from last week, An Instagram photo from last month, etc., ) being right at your fingertip. It’s been in the labs for years. Now it’s about to be in your pocket. It will be in your wireless earbuds. It will soon be in your fully integrated AR/VR headsets and then embedded into your in-eye Ar/Vr contact lenses not even 20yrs away: they are fully working and in clinical human trials now as we speak.

Shortly, you will be able to have yourself speak directly to you if you wish, or with all your knowledge and data & experiences, have Leonardo Da Vinci speak to you in his voice. Or do the same, with all his experiences and yours combined. Or just speak to you with his alone. As our Third Selves have always been available to us, we may just never have been able to talk directly to it. We may have never been fully aware of it yet. But we will be. We will be.

Apple’s new and very wearable Ar/Vr headsets are due out this year, 2023, 16 years after iPhone 1 was launched on Jan 2007 and the typical, radical, 20yr technological shift is right on track. And, with this new technology, new interfaces will be needed. The next wave of end user consumer electronics and technologies are about to be a fully integrated digital extension of ourselves who we talk to, work with, have fun with and which will, most likely, outlive us for others to also interact with when we are gone. Our inaugural Third Self, our own, personal 3rd selves, for each and every one of us to interact with is just a monthly subscription model away, and we, as curious humans, won’t be able to resist. A fully new frontier is about pop into existence  where we will boldly go where ( humanity ) has not gone before.

Did this radical and truly disruptive design ( and as tautological overkill, this disruptive innovation ) 3rd Self just come our of no where? From a eureka moment? Only in it’s idea and naming, but certainly with more than 70yrs of giant’s shoulders to stand on and where in 2015, and with substantial funding, @OpenAi was founded in San Francisco by 6 lead investors collectively to the tune of $1B in capital which has gotten OpenAi to where it is in 2023 – giving us the tools necessary to launch our 3rd Self for each of us. The capabilities necessary to bring our Third Self into being, a 3rd persona ( for a user and by a user with each of our past interactions intact and for any and all electronic devices that we have touched ) means a completely new way of thinking, acting, working, and living. Are we ready for such design power at all our fingertips ? Can we even begin to ” … Think About Our Different Styles of Thinking ? ” and how our 3rd Selves will be created by and for us ? In the above article ( https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/01/16/how-should-we-think-about-our-different-styles-of-thinking ) by @joshuarothman asks all the right questions: do we even know what to do with such power ? And, what does this mean for how our new selves, our Third Selves, who interface directly with us daily will help us design and build the products and services that come from our extra minds that we are each just about ready to bring online at the push of a button ?

With such a radical shift having seismically hit us all ( there isn’t hardly anyone who hasn’t heard of GTP3 and OpenAi by now ) how does such a groundbreaking ( and lengthy 2015-2023 or 8yr journey and again, based on at least 8 previous years before 2015 of rapid technological efforts: government backed education and R&D commercialization efforts ) emerge when more recently the notion that a muse cannot just misalign multiple methods randomly? A muse does not just show up. Not like the muse ( the technology ) of the 3rd Self. This begs us to understand that innovation is not just about seeing the farthest or even the most and/or as rapidly as possible ( that is the department of wild winds ) rather it’s the way the most possibilities are connected in a specifically cohesive alternative way for useful outcomes to coalesce and emerge. For code to be written for specific problem solving to take place. For design typologies to emerge. For architectural systems to come in to being and thus products to be produced from all of the above.

We are at a similar cross roads like the 1st days of the 1st web browser, Mosaic, being launched publicly in Jan 1993 with today’s 1st glimpses of the coming AGI ( Artificial General Intelligence ) breakthrough innovations happening right before our eyes.

Our 3rd Selves are right around the corner.
Our Third Self is just about to be born

 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

 

Tuesday 31 January 2023

Tacit Design Drives Specific Science

When can design inquiry provide a structured approach for scientists ? Bringing design thinking into their work and enhancing their ability to create innovative products, design inquiry can breeds ( and possibly subconsciously ) incredible new product development process in raw science investigators. More where organizations can leverage the benefits of tacit knowledge and drive innovation breakthroughs can even be more plentiful. What then becomes particularly interesting is when Design and design Thinking have become increasingly encouraging in the scientific effort and as described in "Design Enquiry: Tacit Knowledge and Invention in Science" where the role of tacit knowledge and design thinking emerges via tacit efforts to incorporate skills, experiences, and know-how that are often difficult to articulate and transfer to others in the scientific community but where this type of knowledge is crucial to leading to more innovative solutions in the long run.


This is further imagined and investigated via the exploration of the relationship between tacit knowledge and design thinking in the context of new product development where Tacit knowledge as skills, know-how, and experience that are difficult to articulate and transfer to others can create a pathway for tacit knowledge to be critical and which can lead to more innovative solutions if interacted with via sometimes playful and non linear goal oriented exercises later becoming linear and specific. In fact, design thinking and its counterpart capabilities when integrated into scientific research and development efforts easily leverage and outweigh the benefits of tacit knowledge transfer only.

The efforts of the design mentality as a structured approach to incorporating design thinking into the new product development process, allows Design inquiry to provides a semi-structured method for scientists to integrate and enhancing imagination thus providing scientists and other experts with new perspectives, in for example, recent case studies where designers have been able to collaborate with scientists and make significant contributions to their research such as helping researchers understand the problem of differentiating between tube connections used to deliver medication in hospitals. When designers developed prototypes that allowed early evaluation of avant-garde solutions, this eventually led to the development of international standards for this area. In another example, graphic designers working on scientific data representation helped researchers identify new patterns in their data, leading to new clinical applications of the research. The involvement of designers in these projects has also highlighted the importance of teamwork and recognizing the expertise of all partners involved when in the beginning there was no implicit reason to even do so.


 

Share on Linked-In       Email to a friend       Share with a friend on Facebook       Tweet on Twitter
   
   
      
###  
   
   
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts  #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar

 

 

 


---