The notion of design not being enough is a common understanding in the Italian mentality. In the European Mentality. In any mentality that has embraced a Renaissance. Because a Renaissance isn't a time or a place it is a way of realising that "doing" or "creating" or "innovating" or "breaking through" sometimes is only the 1st baby step and can happen in a corporation, a university, a government or a person. What comes next is what's important: creating Art that stands above the innovation. How? Described quite well in Wired's When Innovation Isn’t Enough and certainly in When Good Design Isn’t Enough the reality is that when design and innovation isn't enough, design becomes for the propose and well articulated by Designing Products for Evolving Permanence and Enduring Meaning and this is what makes the future now.
Friday, 29 January 2016
When Design & Innovation Isn't Enough Then What? Here's What.
When Chiara Alessi released DESIGN SENZA DESIGNER (Design without the Designer) the gauntlet was thrown down because when design & innovation isn't enough then what? Art. That's What.
The notion of design not being enough is a common understanding in the Italian mentality. In the European Mentality. In any mentality that has embraced a Renaissance. Because a Renaissance isn't a time or a place it is a way of realising that "doing" or "creating" or "innovating" or "breaking through" sometimes is only the 1st baby step and can happen in a corporation, a university, a government or a person. What comes next is what's important: creating Art that stands above the innovation. How? Described quite well in Wired's When Innovation Isn’t Enough and certainly in When Good Design Isn’t Enough the reality is that when design and innovation isn't enough, design becomes for the propose and well articulated by Designing Products for Evolving Permanence and Enduring Meaning and this is what makes the future now.
. . . . . . . . . . .
The notion of design not being enough is a common understanding in the Italian mentality. In the European Mentality. In any mentality that has embraced a Renaissance. Because a Renaissance isn't a time or a place it is a way of realising that "doing" or "creating" or "innovating" or "breaking through" sometimes is only the 1st baby step and can happen in a corporation, a university, a government or a person. What comes next is what's important: creating Art that stands above the innovation. How? Described quite well in Wired's When Innovation Isn’t Enough and certainly in When Good Design Isn’t Enough the reality is that when design and innovation isn't enough, design becomes for the propose and well articulated by Designing Products for Evolving Permanence and Enduring Meaning and this is what makes the future now.
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Friday, 22 January 2016
Design Necessity - If you Don't Design It, What's the Value of It? Here's What.
What is the Value of Design? Constantly asked, a market necessity and ultimately the same reason to climb mountains. But if you don't design it, then why have value at all?
In the development of "the new" there is not only the value of the function as outlined in Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design? but more specifically in Identity References in Product Design: An Approach for Inter-relating Visual Product Experience and Brand Value Representation detailing further the reasons of perception over function. But is this enough? No.
Often the reality is like minded capabilities and the desire factor of why one thing over another. However this popularity contest is only a function of further philosophical needs to drive behaviour in one way or another and in that a fiefdom model of usage is created: Pepsi vs. Coke. This however is different from the usage model of electricity vs gas and as such a design value model can be codified, measured, bought and sold. What is the value of design? A necessity to climb certain mountains as defined by social and scientific progress. Not to mention of course, aesthetic investigations as tied to the above.
. . . . . . . . . . .
In the development of "the new" there is not only the value of the function as outlined in Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design? but more specifically in Identity References in Product Design: An Approach for Inter-relating Visual Product Experience and Brand Value Representation detailing further the reasons of perception over function. But is this enough? No.
Often the reality is like minded capabilities and the desire factor of why one thing over another. However this popularity contest is only a function of further philosophical needs to drive behaviour in one way or another and in that a fiefdom model of usage is created: Pepsi vs. Coke. This however is different from the usage model of electricity vs gas and as such a design value model can be codified, measured, bought and sold. What is the value of design? A necessity to climb certain mountains as defined by social and scientific progress. Not to mention of course, aesthetic investigations as tied to the above.
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Friday, 15 January 2016
McKinsey says Organize for Breakthroughs? Or Hearding Cats? Here's How
McKinsey, famous for defining darkness as a standard and then inventing lighbulbs, has outlined the model for breakthroughs. Hearding cats is also possible. But how do you encourage breakthroughs? Here's how.
In a recent McKinsey Insights, The discussion turns to "Organizing for Breakthroughs" and clear steps that can create successes in a field that is beset with a very long term window:
- everyone is aware of the products and technologies from the secretary to the scientist
- global heads cause "preferences" but diagnostics reports to X and pharma to Y
- champions determine success: global development or the head of product strategy
- pursue, pursue, pursue. at your own risk
- keep it in the family becuase "giving...a few shares..delivers the worst of both worlds"
- innovation hubs don't help solve specific problems, go where the challenges are
- de"risk" to help late stage efforts make it rather than axing them
- "10 percent more innovation [is better] than 10 percent more efficiency"
- thinking in 30yr cycles means 10-15yr goal windows and 3-5yr focus areas
With these fully valid windows for long term and difficult problems to solve, the outcome is never gauranteed. With shorter windows, we see a better possibility in the hearding cats model of Organizational linkages for new product development: Implementation of innovation projects and specific mechanisms to build cross functional
. . . . . . . . . . .
In a recent McKinsey Insights, The discussion turns to "Organizing for Breakthroughs" and clear steps that can create successes in a field that is beset with a very long term window:
- everyone is aware of the products and technologies from the secretary to the scientist
- global heads cause "preferences" but diagnostics reports to X and pharma to Y
- champions determine success: global development or the head of product strategy
- pursue, pursue, pursue. at your own risk
- keep it in the family becuase "giving...a few shares..delivers the worst of both worlds"
- innovation hubs don't help solve specific problems, go where the challenges are
- de"risk" to help late stage efforts make it rather than axing them
- "10 percent more innovation [is better] than 10 percent more efficiency"
- thinking in 30yr cycles means 10-15yr goal windows and 3-5yr focus areas
With these fully valid windows for long term and difficult problems to solve, the outcome is never gauranteed. With shorter windows, we see a better possibility in the hearding cats model of Organizational linkages for new product development: Implementation of innovation projects and specific mechanisms to build cross functional
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Friday, 8 January 2016
R&D&D How Great Ideas Become Game Changers
What
is the capacity of innovators in 2016? What is the capability of R&D&Design influence in the future? How
does this empower designers to create game changing environments? Here’s how.
In
Understanding
influences on engineering creativity and innovation: a biographical study of 12
outstanding engineering
designers and innovators the basis of personality types, design mentalities, efficacy
capabilities
and more, management mentalities are explored and detailed to understand the
value that design plays in the R&D mind.
###
####
#iGNITIATE #Design #DesignThinking #DesignInnovation #IndustrialDesign #iGNITEconvergence #iGNITEprogram #DesignLeadership #LawrenceLivermoreNationalLabs #NSF #USNavy #EcoleDesPonts #Topiade #LouisVuitton #WorldRetailCongress #REUTPALA #WorldRetailCongress #OM #Fujitsu #Sharing #Swarovski #321-Contact #Bausch&Lomb #M.ONDE #SunStar
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Tuesday, 29 December 2015
MIT & Design – The Next Zuckerberg Will be a Designer
More
than expected design is playing a larger and larger role. Especially when the
world is not content with only one Zuckerberg. But where will the next one
emerge? From design.
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Tuesday, 22 December 2015
3D Is Here. Now What Will Make The World Use it?
3D
has been in our lives for more than 40 years with the earliest of forms in
vector graphics games of the 70’s and the early emersive work of Jaron Lanier.
Times have changed.
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Friday, 18 December 2015
Innovation Toolkits for the First Stage New Service Development
New
Services and New Products occupy the same domain of innovation but often very
dissimilar interactions. This is the basis for the use of Toolkits
for the First Stages of New Service Development
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Friday, 11 December 2015
The Governance of Design – How the Europeans Make Design Happen
In
the world of design, it is often the many forms of interaction between
manufacturers and designers that foster the complete model for pushing the
boundries of new product development. But how?
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Friday, 4 December 2015
When Do Firms Undertake R&D By Investing In New Ventures?
When
design plus R&D really get moving, it’s risk that firms are faced with:
risk to show validity, risk to prove efficacy, and of course risk to scale with
the latter being the largest concern of investor confidence. Is there a way to
mitigate this?
Referred
to in When
Do Firms Undertake R&D By Investing In New Ventures? with the most
success coming from areas where weak intellectual property protection and where
complementary distribution
capability creates the capability for design success. The data and statistical
sampling of industries and functional capabilities indicate even further
correlations between design functions and R&D success.
#Design by
iGNITIATE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
---